One person builds this, and nothing publishes without you
Running today
- The report: 12 buyer questions on the free plan, 30 on a paid one, across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini
- Which questions your client loses, and the named competitor that won each one
- What is missing from the site, and the changes that would answer it
- Every change split in two: what we publish for you, and what only you can do
- The approval queue on a paid plan — we draft, you approve each one
- White-label reports on the Agency plan — your name and logo, not ours, on a private link for the client
- 11 free tools, no account
Being built
- Publishing an approved draft into WordPress, with one-click undo
- Re-test triggered by publishing, so the result is measured and not claimed
- A standing client portal, instead of a link per report
Why it exists
An agency that runs AI search visibility for a roster has two bad options today. Tools priced per site cost more than the retainer once there are fifteen clients. Tools that publish on their own put things on a client’s site that nobody read first — and the half of the work that most often justifies the engagement (claiming the directory profiles, chasing the reviews, getting an answer out of the client) is the half a content robot never surfaces, because it cannot bill for it.
So this is priced per roster rather than per site, $199 for 15 client sites, and every change it finds is split in two: what we can publish for you, and what only you can do. The second column is not a limitation we are hiding. It is usually the project.
How it makes money
One price per client site, $0 to $499 a month. No credits, no per-article price, no task quota, and no share of what you charge your client — what you bill for the work is between you and them. Payments go through Dodo Payments, which is the merchant of record: it charges the card and issues the invoice. Refunds are full inside fourteen days of the first charge, no questions asked.
What it will not do
Not a roadmap gap — decisions, and they are not expected to change:
- No link building. Nothing is bought, exchanged or placed on another site.
- No social posting and no paid ads. Neither is what an assistant reads when it decides whom to recommend.
- No weekly rank tracking. Answers are re-asked after a change is published, so the comparison means something; a dashboard that moves every Monday is a different product.
- No single visibility score. A number gives your client something to argue about instead of questions to read.
One person, and what that means for you
The person who answers hello@passcite.com wrote the code. That cuts both ways, and the honest version is worth saying on the page rather than in a support thread:
- Nothing is written to a client’s site without an approval — that is the product, not a policy, and it is the same mechanism whether we are one person or forty.
- If something published through Passcite damages a client’s site, that billing period is refunded without you having to ask.
- There is no account manager, no phone line and no ticket portal. There is one address, and it is read.
The crawler that reads your client’s site identifies itself and explains itself at PassciteBot; what is stored and how to have it deleted is in the privacy policy. Anything else: write.
See who the engines recommend instead
12 buyer questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. You get the questions your client loses, who won them, and what is missing from the site. No score, no signup wall.