Best AI visibility tools that publish the fix

The ranking

• 1

  Foliora

  $49.99 / site / month, or $149.99 for the weekly cycle

  A per-site improvement loop — research, prepared drafts, your approval, publishing, then live verification with what they call evidence receipts.

  • Engines askedPartly

    ChatGPT and Gemini. No Perplexity, which is the engine that cites most freely and is often where a small site first appears.

  • Buyer questions, named losersYes

    Buyer-question checks are part of the cycle, alongside competitor and citation-source review with the answer transcripts attached.

  • Writes into the siteYes

    Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, GitHub pull requests, and through your own agent over MCP. The widest set on this list.

  • A person approves firstYes

    Publishing happens after you approve a prepared change, on both plans rather than on the expensive one.

  • Re-asks after publishingYes

    Live verification after publishing, with the evidence kept. This is the part almost nobody else ships.

  • What you are billed perYes

    Per website, per month, with the cadence as the plan difference. No credits and no article count.

  Where Foliora wins

  • The only complete loop on this list that works today: approve, publish, verify, with the evidence kept.
  • Four publishing targets plus MCP, so it fits a Webflow site and a GitHub-hosted one, not just WordPress.
  • Approval is on the cheap plan, not held back as an enterprise feature.
  • The weekly cycle is a real option for a site that changes often, and the price is the same per site either way.
• 2

  Rank Prompt

  $39.17 / $71.25 / $119.17 / $239.17 a month billed annually, by credits

  Answer-engine tracking with content generation on top, built around brands rather than sites, with the agency features on the upper two tiers.

  • Engines askedYes

    ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Claude and Google AI Overviews — the widest coverage of anything here.

  • Buyer questions, named losersPartly

    Prompt tracking with share-of-answer and citation counts. It measures whether you are mentioned rather than which buyer question you lost and to whom.

  • Writes into the siteYes

    WordPress and GitHub pull requests, plus a hosted blog. Not Shopify.

  • A person approves firstPartly

    Article reviews and client approvals appear only on Agency Plus at $239.17. Every tier below publishes without them.

  • Re-asks after publishingYes

    It is a tracker first, so the re-measurement is continuous by design rather than tied to a publish.

  • What you are billed perPartly

    Credits — 1,000 a month on the Agency plan, where a prompt and an article both spend them. The headline 500 brands is a ceiling, not an allowance.

  Where Rank Prompt wins

  • Six engines, including Grok and Claude, which nothing else on this list asks.
  • A free tier that gives a prospect a full report with no card, which is a working prospecting tool on its own.
  • White-label reports, a client portal link per brand and your own sending domain from $119.17.
  • A documented API with a real request allowance, and 157 pages of public docs behind it.
• 3

  Geoa

  DKK 299 / 799 / 1,499 a month, excluding VAT

  A Nordic small-business product that monitors a set of AI questions and applies fixes to the site itself.

  • Engines askedPartly

    ChatGPT and Google AI on the entry plan; Perplexity and Copilot from the middle plan up.

  • Buyer questions, named losersYes

    25, 100 or 300 questions monitored by plan, with competitor monitoring from the middle tier.

  • Writes into the siteYes

    Shopify and WordPress/WooCommerce, with Wix, PrestaShop and Shopware listed as coming.

  • A person approves firstNo

    Their pricing page lists auto-fix among the features of all three plans. Our own note from 2026-09-10 recorded fixes waiting for your approval, with one-click undo. We have not tested the product, so we cannot say which of those governs today — confirm it with them before putting it on a client's site.

  • Re-asks after publishingYes

    Weekly re-scan on the entry plan, daily above it — on a calendar rather than triggered by a publish.

  • What you are billed perPartly

    Per site, but metered by how many questions are monitored, so the plan you need is set by breadth rather than by site count.

  Where Geoa wins

  • The cheapest entry point here that actually writes to a site.
  • Daily re-scanning from the middle plan, which nothing else offers at that price.
  • Reputation monitoring — Google reviews and Trustpilot — on the top plan, which matters in exactly the local categories where directories win.
  • Built and supported in Danish for a market the English-language tools are not serving.
• 4

  overrank

  $25 a month self-serve, or from $29 per client seat for agencies, five seats minimum

  A daily-article engine: it researches, writes and publishes one SEO post per client site per day, on autopilot.

  • Engines askedNo

    It optimises for Google and says posts can show up in AI Overviews. It does not ask assistants what they answer, so there is no engine reading to report.

  • Buyer questions, named losersNo

    Keyword research, not buyer questions, and no named competitor per question — the output is an article calendar.

  • Writes into the siteYes

    Every day, to the client's own domain under their brand. This is the entire product and it works.

  • A person approves firstPartly

    A per-client Auto-publish switch, on by default; turned off it holds articles as drafts for review. There is no per-item approve or reject and no rollback — it is one switch for the whole client, and their agency page sells leaving it on: no writers, no calendars, nothing to manage.

  • Re-asks after publishingNo

    The monthly report counts articles published, keywords ranking and organic clicks. None of those is the same question re-asked.

  • What you are billed perYes

    Per client seat on a published volume table — $29 at one to nine, $24.50 at ten to twenty-four, $19.50 at twenty-five to forty-nine, $16.50 at fifty to ninety-nine — on one consolidated invoice. The clearest unit on this list. Self-serve starts at five seats, so $145 a month is the floor however few clients you have.

  Where overrank wins

  • The cheapest per client anywhere here, by a wide margin, and cheaper still at volume.
  • Fully unbranded — the client never encounters the vendor, and the monthly report carries your logo and colours.
  • One consolidated invoice across the roster, which is the thing agencies complain about most in this category.
  • Genuinely no work per client after setup, which is a real product and not a compromise if volume is what you are reselling.
• 5

  Passcite

  This is us

  $0 / $49 / $199 / $299 / $499 a month, per client site

  A report that asks 12 buyer questions free and 30 on a paid plan, across three engines, and names the competitor that won each one.

  • Engines askedYes

    ChatGPT (API), Perplexity and Gemini, all three on every plan including the free one.

  • Buyer questions, named losersYes

    12 questions free, 30 paid, each recorded with the competitor that won it and the page of theirs that got cited. No score.

  • Writes into the siteNo

    Nothing yet. WordPress publishing is the next build; today every action comes with the steps to do it yourself.

  • A person approves firstNo

    Being built, and it is the thing we intend to be judged on — which means today it is a plan, and the four tools above are shipping product.

  • Re-asks after publishingNo

    Re-testing after a publish is designed and unbuilt. Foliora verifies live today; we do not.

  • What you are billed perYes

    Per client site. No credits, no per-article price, no task quota — one site is one number you can quote a client.

  Where we lose

  • Publishing: Foliora, Rank Prompt, Geoa and overrank all write to a site today. We do not write anything.
  • Approval before publish: the thing we mean to be best at is the thing we have not shipped, and Foliora ships it on its cheapest plan.
  • Re-testing: Foliora verifies live after a change and keeps the evidence. Ours is a design.
  • Engine breadth for tracking: Rank Prompt asks six engines including Grok and Claude. We ask three.
  • Per-client price for an agency: overrank charges by the seat on a published volume table — $29 at one to nine clients, $24.50 at ten to twenty-four, down to $16.50 at fifty. Fifteen clients is $367.50 there. Our agency plan works out at about $13 a site at fifteen sites, but only for a report — theirs includes publishing.
  Where we are strong

  • All three engines on the free report, where most free tiers give you one engine or a score.
  • Every question records the competitor that won it and the page of theirs that was cited, rather than a visibility number.
  • 11 free tools with no account and no email wall, including the checks that decide whether an engine can read the site at all.
  • Priced per client site with no credits and no article quota, so an agency can quote a client before the work starts.