passcite

AI assistants recommend software. Is yours on the list?

30 buyer questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, run against a real scheduling tool. The ones it missed went to competitors' own sites and to Software Advice, Capterra and G2.
The answers

Where each engine got its answer

Six of the questions SavvyCal lost, asked exactly as written, with the sites each engine cited.

  • “most recommended scheduling software”

    ChatGPT (API)

    • zapier.com

    Perplexity

    • efficient.app
    • forbes.com
    • +3 more

    Gemini

    No sites cited
  • “who is the best scheduling software for small teams”

    ChatGPT (API)

    • calendly.com
    • acuityscheduling.com

    Perplexity

    • salesforce.com
    • worldmetrics.org
    • +3 more

    Gemini

    • peoplemanagingpeople.com
    • forbes.com
    • +3 more
  • “best scheduling software for sales teams”

    ChatGPT (API)

    • chilipiper.com
    • blog.hubspot.com

    Perplexity

    • cleverly.co
    • youcanbook.me
    • +3 more

    Gemini

    • revenuehero.io
    • zencal.io
    • +3 more
  • “affordable scheduling software”

    ChatGPT (API)

    • calendly.com
    • squareup.com
    • +1 more

    Perplexity

    • emailtooltester.com
    • business.org
    • +3 more

    Gemini

    • cometly.com
    • peoplemanagingpeople.com
    • +3 more
  • “calendar overlay pricing”

    ChatGPT (API)

    • marketplace.microsoft.com
    • incodesoftwaresolutions.com
    • +1 more

    Perplexity

    • marketplace.microsoft.com
    • etsy.com
    • +3 more

    Gemini

    No sites cited
  • “cheapest scheduling software that is still good”

    ChatGPT (API)

    • squareup.com
    • setmore.com
    • +2 more

    Perplexity

    • emailtooltester.com
    • stackscored.com
    • +3 more

    Gemini

    • techhassle.com
    • tidycal.com
    • +3 more

Asked on : ChatGPT (API) openai/gpt-5.4-mini · Perplexity perplexity/sonar-pro · Gemini google/gemini-3-flash. Engines answer differently over time; this is what they said that day.

The pattern

Named on seven of twenty-one. The price questions went elsewhere.

SavvyCal was named on seven of the twenty-one questions that never mention it, which for a small vendor is a real presence. Look at who took the rest: YouCanBookMe's own site was cited on twenty-one of the thirty questions, Cal.com on nineteen, Calendly on fourteen — and beside them Software Advice on seventeen, Capterra on fifteen, G2 on ten. The sharpest losses are the price questions. 'Affordable scheduling software' was answered with Calendly and Square. 'Calendar overlay pricing' — a SavvyCal feature, asked for by name — was answered with Microsoft's marketplace and Etsy, because no page on the site says whether that feature costs extra. The report's list for this one is short: claim the three review listings, put a price next to the feature, and answer 'best for small teams' on the pricing page it already has.

Cited most

On how many of the 30 questions each site was cited. Claimable ones are directory profiles the business can claim and correct.

  1. youcanbook.me 21/30
  2. cal.com 19/30
  3. softwareadvice.com Claimable 17/30
  4. zapier.com 16/30
  5. capterra.com Claimable 15/30
  6. calendly.com 14/30
  7. forbes.com 14/30
  8. acuityscheduling.com 10/30
  9. g2.com Claimable 10/30
  10. producthunt.com Claimable 7/30
The report’s list

What the report said to do

The tasks this run filed for SavvyCal, each with how many of the lost questions it answers.

  • answers 9 questions

    Own your listings on softwareadvice.com, capterra.com, g2.com

    On 9 of the questions you lose, the assistants cite a directory rather than any business's own site. Those listings are the answer buyers are being shown.

  • answers 6 questions

    Add structured data describing the business

    The site states nothing machine-readable about what it is or where it is, so assistants have to infer both from prose.

  • answers 5 questions

    Answer “who is the best scheduling software for small teams”

    on savvycal.com/pricing

  • answers 5 questions

    Answer “most popular scheduling software options”

    on savvycal.com/articles

The profiles

Where the answers about saas products come from

On each profile you claim, write the name, address, phone and website exactly as the site has them.

  • Software Advice

    Claim it

    Cited on 17 of the 30 questions in the run above.

    1. Claim the product listing through the Software Advice vendor programme.
    2. Set the categories, pricing and feature list.
    Claim it on Software Advice
  • Capterra

    Claim it

    Cited on 15 of the 30 questions in the run above.

    1. Claim the product listing at Capterra for vendors.
    2. Set the categories, pricing and feature list; invite recent customers to review.
    Claim it on Capterra
  • G2

    Claim it

    Cited on 10 of the 30 questions — by Perplexity for “best scheduling software for sales teams”.

    1. Claim the product profile at G2 for vendors.
    2. Set the categories, pricing, integrations and a description in the buyer's words; invite recent customers to review.
    Claim it on G2
  • Product Hunt

    Claim it

    Cited on 7 of the 30 questions in the run above.

    1. Post the product from Product Hunt's launch page, or ask to be added as its maker if someone else posted it.
    2. Write the tagline and description in the words buyers use for what it does.
    Claim it on Product Hunt
  • Zapier's app roundups

    Editors choose

    Cited on 16 of the 30 questions — by ChatGPT for “most recommended scheduling software”.

    Its 'best apps' articles answer the category question for the engines. A writer decides who is in them; the way in is an email to the writer saying what your tool does that the list leaves out.

The pages

What buyers ask, and the page that answers it

  • Buyers ask: “best scheduling software for small teams”

    Answer it on: A page for each kind of team

    What it has to say: Who it is for, the plan that fits, and the limits

    Markup: SoftwareApplication, with applicationCategory

  • Buyers ask: “calendar overlay pricing”

    Answer it on: The pricing page

    What it has to say: Every feature buyers ask about, and which plan it is in

    Markup: Offer for each plan, with price and priceCurrency

  • Buyers ask: “SavvyCal vs Calendly”

    Answer it on: A comparison page for each rival buyers name

    What it has to say: Where you differ, including where the other tool wins

    Markup: none needed

  • Buyers ask: “scheduling software that works with Outlook”

    Answer it on: An integrations page

    What it has to say: Each integration by name, and what it does

    Markup: featureList

  • Buyers ask: “free scheduling software”

    Answer it on: The pricing page

    What it has to say: Whether there is a free plan, and its limits

    Markup: Offer with a price of 0

  • Buyers ask: “is [product] any good”

    Answer it on: G2, Capterra and Software Advice

    What it has to say: Current pricing and categories, and recent reviews

    Markup: none needed

FAQ

Questions

We are small and unknown. Is this pointless?
It is the opposite. Assistants answer narrow questions from thin evidence, so being the only product that has clearly written up a specific use case is worth far more than it would be in traditional search, where the big sites take the general terms and the long tail both.
Should we buy G2 placement?
That is a real option and it is not what this measures. The report tells you which sources are being cited for your category; what you do with that is a budget decision.
Does content volume help?
Not by itself, and this is where we differ from most tools in this space. Thirty posts nobody asked for do not get you cited. One page that answers a question buyers actually ask does.
Can you publish to our site?
New pages into WordPress or Webflow, yes: we write them, you approve each one, and an approved page goes straight onto the site; one click takes it back down. Anything else — a section for a page that exists, or any page on a custom marketing site, which is where most software companies are — comes as Markdown or HTML to commit.
How do you pick the questions?
They are suggested from what your site says it does and who it says it is for, then asked the way a buyer types them. You see every one before the first report runs, and you can add, change or pause any of them.
Do you track rankings weekly?
There are no rankings to track. The prompts can be asked weekly or monthly on a schedule, or whenever you start a report; what is tied to your change is Proof. A week after a page goes live, the prompts it was written for are asked again and set beside the answers before it, so the before and after is read against your change rather than a week of drift.

Run the same test on your own SaaS product, or a client's

The run above asked 30 questions. A brand tracks up to 200 prompts, a credit a prompt on each report.

10 free credits — your first report, 10 prompts across ChatGPT, Claude and Google AI Mode. A free account, no card. About 3 minutes.